I recently read an article written by Ralph D. Winter entitle “The Highest Priority: Cross Cultural Evangelism.” He submitted the paper to the Lausanne Conference of 1974. The Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization seeks to encourage and stimulate the involvement of churches, denominations, ministries, networks, and individuals in the cause of world evangelization. Their mission statement is: "The whole Church taking the whole Gospel to the whole world." To find out more about the Lausanne Committee you can go here. To see the other documents of Lausanne 1974 you can go here.
This article addresses specifically cross-cultural evangelism as it relates to the global mission field. As I read the paper, I first considered how it might apply to our church’s desire to bring the gospel to the Kuvi/Dongaria Khond people. Yet, as I reflected upon it more, I realized that it speaks directly to evangelism, ministry, and worship here in northwest Arkansas and even more specifically here at UBC.
Three Types of Evangelism
Winter outlines three different kinds of evangelism: E-1, E-2, and E-3 evangelism. E-1 evangelism occurs when an individual from the same cultural, linguistic, socio-economic, and other backgrounds shares the gospel with another individual/group from the same background. E-2 evangelism occurs when an individual shares the gospel with another individual/group from a similar but not the same background. The culture may be a little different; the linguistic dialect may be somewhat different, or the social structure may be a little unique. E-2 evangelism is a little more challenging and may require different techniques to effectively communicate the gospel. E-3 evangelism occurs when an individual shares the gospel with another individual/group from a totally different background. The culture, language, and economic status are usually different creating significant barriers to sharing the gospel effectively.
For example, on our trip to the Kuvi/Dongaria Khond (DK) this past April, I was given the opportunity to share the gospel with the village of Gorta. Obviously, they were a significantly different culture, social status, economic status, educational status, and language to name just a few. This would be E-3 evangelism. Before I shared the gospel with the villagers, we wanted the new DK covert to share the message of salvation with his own people. As I mentioned in a previous post, this experience will go down in my “most memorable moments” of my life. This type of evangelism would be E-1. Jetu was sharing with people from his own culture. He spoke the language and shared in terms that they could understand. Though he was from a different village, it was still a DK sharing with DK. Now let’s say that the village of Gorta came to Christ and began to evangelize the other nearby DK villages. This would still be E-1 evangelism. But, if they began to share with other tribal groups such as the Kutia, Sitar, Malua, or Desia, it would be E-2 evangelism. These tribes speak a little different dialect and have a little different cultural and social background. For example, the Sitar people are known as the weavers as they weave baskets, containers, hats, mats, etc. The DK are primarily agriculturalists and do very little weaving. The DK could possibly understand what the Sitar are saying but it would be a little more difficult as the dialect is unique. The Kutia people live in the hills like the DK but they are the most primitive of all the tribals or Khond people. The women are barely clothed and their villages are even less advanced than the DK. Yet, all of these tribal people are somewhat similar and the boundaries to cross are not that significant.
As we do E-3 evangelism among the Kuvi/DK, we hope to raise up new converts who will do E-1 evangelism among their own people. As a church planting movement begins, we will want to encourage the Kuvi/DK to do E-2 evangelism among their cousin tribes. E-1 evangelism is the most effective. E-2 is less effective and E-3 is the least effective. All three types of evangelism are necessary, though the goal is to bring E-1 evangelism to the people group as quickly as possible.
E-2 and E-3 in Our Community
So how does this relate to northwest Arkansas or to UBC? Do these three types of evangelism transfer to our individual or corporate ministry of evangelism? I believe that they do. UBC has its own unique background. Though we are a church that is open and welcoming to any and everyone who would like to be a part of the vision, mission, ministries, and relationships we call UBC, we have a unique identity or DNA. There are exceptions, but on the whole we are a Caucasian, middle-class, and well-educated group of believers. Overall, our family worship service is fairly traditional and our preaching is evangelical. We are a Southern Baptist Church that embraces other ministries and mission efforts. These descriptions are fairly broad but give enough of a fingerprint to distinguish us from other churches in the area.
The vast majority of those who visit UBC fit into these categories. Is this a bad thing? No, it is a natural thing. We naturally invite people to our church that are within our spheres of influence and relationship. The majority of those led to Christ who plug into our church usually fit into these categories.
One of the most significant helps and evangelistic ministries of our church is Second Mile. They administer the grace of God by helping people who are in desperate need. They also faithfully share the gospel with everyone who comes through the doors for help and as a result, many decisions for Christ are made. What ever happens with those new believers? Why do so few ever plug into our church body?
Angela and I have become friends with an individual who has been ministered to through Second Mile. We have invited her to church on numerous occasions. She lives just a few blocks away but has yet to ever come to a worship service. She shared with us one day why she could not attend UBC. She first said that she didn’t have anything appropriate to wear. We told her that it doesn’t matter what you wear to church, but it really mattered to her. She also said that she wouldn’t fit in with all of us rich folks. I’m not sure what the definition of rich is, but when you’re living from welfare check to welfare check trying to raise four children alone, it doesn’t take muck to be called rich. She also said that our church was just too big. As we shared with her, I realized that it wasn’t E-3 sharing, but it was definitely not E-1. Our church was a different culture to her - a different socio-economic status that she could not relate to.
At this point, there are a couple of choices. First, we can just right her off. Her excuses for not being involved with a church fellowship will be nullified before a holy God. Secondly, we can help her find a church that is more “culturally” relevant to her situation. Thirdly, we can seek out new methods of providing ministry and worship opportunities that she can relate to here at UBC. Actually, the later did take place at UBC for awhile. There was a member who had a burden for the new Second Mile believers. He formed a Bible Study for them on Sunday mornings meeting in the Second Mile building. The potential for a ministry like this is enormous. What would happen if God’s Spirit came down mightily upon such a ministry to the point where we were having 100-150 people show up on Sunday morning? Would we have to insist that they filter into our regular worship service or eventually combine with our regular service? I would say no. This new body of believers will be able to do E-1 evangelism and reach a far greater number of people from similar backgrounds that our regular ministries and worship service could through E-2 relationships.
Let me touch on another hot topic that continually circulates among our church. Should the college students continue to have their own worship service and ministries or should they be combined into one unified ministry? It sounds wonderful for all of the different groups being together in unity. To worship and minister together is surely what God intends for the church to do and be. Yet, I’m afraid that we’re sometimes more concerned with uniformity and than with unity.
We have a Chinese Bible study that meets in our facilities on Friday night. They don’t join with us on Sunday morning and we wouldn’t expect them to as the cultural divide is probably too wide. We might even realize that new Second Mile believers will seldom enter our worship center and it would be a great thing to offer a unique setting for those believers so that they can grow and flourish in their faith and more effectively reach others within their particular sphere of influence and background. Yet, with the college, we see them more as E-1 relationship rather than E-2. Sure, there are some college students who come to our regular worship service and prefer it above our more progressive college service. Sure, there are some who want to be more integrated or at least have the opportunity to rub shoulders with families and older adults. Yet, the vast majority of college students have difficulty making the “cultural” leap to our service. In fact, if they college student is totally unchurched, it may feel more like E-3.
Unity or Uniformity
Is it a matter of method or a matter of biblical principle? Is it more about unity in Christ or about uniformity in UBC? Is it kingdom mindedness or kingdom building? Well, I’m still struggling with this issue, but you can tell where I’m leaning. I’d love to be a part of a church that doesn’t define unity by the single type of worship service or ministry it offers. I think it would be awesome to have multiple worship and ministry settings that reach out into many different cultural settings of our community. I would love to be a part of a church involved in E-1, E-2, and E-3 evangelism, missions, ministry, and relationship. I think it would be incredible to have Hispanic, Chinese, Second Mile, College, Traditional, Contemporary, Blue Grass, etc. gatherings on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday all giving glory in their setting and worship language. May the glory of God be the uniting theme of our worship, our ministries, our evangelism, our missions, our relationships, and our all.